Firefox should implement DNS over QUIC (DoQ) as defined in RFC 9250 to improve DNS resolution performance and maintain its privacy leadership. Chrome doesn't support DoQ yet, giving Firefox an opportunity to take the lead.
QUIC/HTTP2/HTTP3 as it exists now, should not even exist.
The official general idea of making things quicker is not the problem with it.
The problem is the webificaiton… a case of the inter-platform effect. A duplication of existing functionality from lower levels, by trying to turn the entire Internet communication into the WWW (aka web). By merging HTTP, the *hypertext* transport protocol with the universal TCP, despite most packets not being hypertext nor any of that hypertext-related functionality being suited or useful for them. Apart from that stuff not exactly making everything faster for any Internet protocol but web traffic.
It is just yet another attempt by Google to undermine and control the web by turning it into more of themselves.
Again, we are not against its improvements or any of that. But they didn’t need to add the toxic underhanded parts that come with it! They could have done just it, without being … [something that would probably get me banned if I said it].
Also, Mozilla doesn’t have to follow everything Google says just because they are financially de-facto a Google subsidiary that is only kept alive as an alibi to fend of accusations of monopolism while growing worse and worse every year so nobody actually wants to use it and the monopoly is strengthened.
In addition to DOQ, encrypted dns with the dnscrypt protocol are required. The following website is the one I did, which collects a lot of encrypted DNS for the DNSCRYPT protocol