cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Firefox 98 - PDF Dowload and view

roxpec
Making moves

Managing PDF downloads and viewing has become a big problem with version 89. I am a programmer who has been working on healthcare applications for a few years and there are scenarios where it is convenient to download and in others where it is convenient to preview the document. These scenarios vary from application to application, but also within the same application. So these types of behaviors should be left to whoever designs the application, not to the browser. Today I have a lot of pissed off customers because it is no longer possible to download a PDF file without previewing.

88 REPLIES 88

Wux2000
Making moves

Same problem. I don't want to view pdf documents in the browser, I have dedicated apps for that. Unfortunately I cannot change the default action. Even worse: When opening a pdf document in the browser it is automatically downloaded to a default place and occupies storage there. Moving it to the dedicated order requires additional clicks - which is imho completely unnecessary.

 


@Wux2000 wrote:

Same problem. I don't want to view pdf documents in the browser, I have dedicated apps for that. Unfortunately I cannot change the default action.


What happens when you try the steps in this article: https://support.mozilla.org/kb/view-pdf-files-firefox-or-choose-another-viewer 


Even worse: When opening a pdf document in the browser it is automatically downloaded to a default place and occupies storage there. Moving it to the dedicated order requires additional clicks - which is imho completely unnecessary.


If you select the "Always Ask" option, Firefox 98+ will download the file to your "Save files to:" folder when you choose "Open with [relevant application]". Firefox 102 will bring an option for Windows and Linux users to return to using the system Temp folder for that if you prefer the way it worked before Firefox 98.

roxpec
Making moves

I have same news,

with last update 102 all file are save without exstension.  😭

I can't stand it anymore! it is not sustainable that every small update there are such blocking problems.


@roxpec wrote:

with last update 102 all file are save without exstension.  😭

I can't stand it anymore! it is not sustainable that every small update there are such blocking problems.

That is strange.

Is this related to the issue of the PDFs that are served with Content-Disposition: attachment that Firefox started opening in a new tab -- saving from the new tab loses the .pdf file extension?

Or is this for other kinds of downloads?

A user on the Mozilla Support forum reported that downloads of .exe files from one site are renamed with a .bin extension. We haven't figured out what is causing that, but it sounds like there must have been some change related to file extensions between Firefox 101 and 102.

Hi jscher2000,

Thanks for answering me.

I found the problem. It seems that Firefox102 adds the file extension according to the value of the contained ContentType response header . I did some tests (pdf download), in particular by setting ContentType:

  • application/x-download-pdf: the saved file without extension
  • application/oct-Stream: the file is opened in new tab with .pdf extesnsion
  • application/zip: The file is saved with the .zip extension

So I went back to the starting point, the solution you had always suggested(ContentType = application/x-download-pdf) in this discussion is no longer valid.

roxpec_0-1656867109635.png

I don't think that only my application needs to view a draft of a report in PDF and make the dowlown of the final report in PDF. So as already mentioned if there are specifications to follow there is no problem the importance that these specifications are valid over time and above all those who develop the application have the faculty to choose the desired behavior. For example, the PDF displayed in the previous image has the uninhabited printing and also the "Saveas" but PDF.JS allows you to print anyway. In fact PDF.JS is another component to improve.

Thank you

Sorry about that, I didn't expect to make it worse.

When I test, Firefox treats it as a PDF based on the filename in the Content-Disposition header:

https://www.jeffersonscher.com/res/servepdf.php?f=bugzilla-home.pdf&ct=application/x-download-pdf

So fooling the PDF detector in this way seems to have stopped working in Firefox 102 and I agree there is no more point to that workaround if you are setting a *.pdf file name -- and obviously omitting the file name causes other problems.

Regarding printing: It's true that PDF.js doesn't honor copy and print restrictions. If you are using an embedded viewer and you need to control the available features, you can load the PDF.js library (or possibly another JavaScript library that renders PDFs) on your site and control exactly what buttons are shown on the toolbar. https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/wiki/Setup-PDF.js-in-a-website

I report my last test.
By setting the headers as follows:
Content-disposition : attachment; filename="myFile.pdf"
ContentType: x-download-pdf
the PDF viewer opens in a new tab and at the same time the download is made

roxpec
Making moves

The pdf problem seems to be related to a bug reported 14 years ago and fixed on FireFox 98

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453455

roxpec_0-1657211190117.png

other interesting links

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1769368

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1778021