cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
chi
Strollin' around
Status: Trending idea

I think it's a great opportunity for Firefox to stand out by supporting JPEG XL before any other browser.

Imagine images served by Cloudflare and Cloudinary load faster and look better only with Firefox. Firefox was a pioneer of web technologies and it should win the title back, if Firefox just keep following Chrome without any differentiation, why would people choose Firefox?

If the decoder memory safety is a concern, maybe Mozilla can start a crowd funding campaign to sponsor a Rust decoder, even the campaign itself will attract reports and attentions for Firefox.

Mozilla argued AVIF was already supported as a same generation but clearly JPEG XL has many advantages:

  • Much better encoding performance (AVIF is not suitable for realtime CDN optimization at all)
  • lossless and better high fidelity (video codec based image format)
  • HDR (there will be a billion of mobile devices with real good & bright screen in just a few years)
  • Little generation loss (important for web)

Supports from Facebook, Adobe (they're adding export support), Intel and VESA, Krita, The Guardian, libvips, Cloudinary, Shopify

comparison

203 Comments
regs
Making moves

> Not in review? 

Not even in review. Top 2nd non-delivered idea...

TyDraniu
Strollin' around

Recently they started removing old C++ implementation and landing Rust based JXL decoder. 

2mustange
Making moves

This should be "in development" no? Clearly there is movement on Bug 1539075 

 

John14
Making moves

Yes, JPEG-XL has great specifications and I want to see it supported too!

Including its HDR support!

Nickname
Strollin' around

Now that Google Chrome FINALLY adopts JPGXL you could finally enable this by default.
Danke!
Source: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/WjCKcBw219k/m/NmOyvMCCBAAJ?pli=1

mbanksj
New member

I really think it's time Firefox added full support for Jpg XL, a format can never even have a chance if software doesn't add support.
It should be the format of the future, as it adds improvements in every way.
Smaller file sizes, alpha, 8-32bit support, faster loading times, HDR support, better compression algorithms.
Check out this page for comparisons - https://jpegxl.info/

Jon
Community Manager
Community Manager

(Note: similar ideas have been merged into this thread)

Formerly-Dasein
New member

The news about Adobe & the PDF Association announcing the integration of JXL as part of their specs appears to have pushed Google's Chromium Team into reconsidering their old position *(Where they originally decided to pause work on JPG-XL & closed the issue requesting it on their web platform)* maybe Mozilla could change their stance for Firefox aswell in light of this?