<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic resistFingerprinting inadvertently increases uniqueness: DNT auto-enable and outdated hardwareConcurrency=2 spoof in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/resistfingerprinting-inadvertently-increases-uniqueness-dnt-auto/m-p/138870#M56435</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Mozilla,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to share two findings about Firefox's fingerprinting resistance&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;(resistFingerprinting) that I believe are working against their own goal&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;of making users less unique, rather than more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Enhanced Tracking Protection automatically enables the Do Not Track&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;header, and this cannot be disabled without also disabling tracking&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;protection itself. According to my testing on EFF's "Cover Your Tracks"&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;tool, sending DNT actually adds around 1.9 bits of identifying&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;information, because relatively few browsers send it today, making it&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;counterproductive to the goal of blending in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. When resistFingerprinting is enabled, navigator.hardwareConcurrency&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;is spoofed to a fixed value of 2, based on a 2017 Mozilla statistic&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;showing most users had 2-core devices at the time. In my testing, this&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;value now adds around 4.5 bits of identifying information, since most&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;devices today report 4+ cores by default. An updated statistic reflecting&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;current hardware trends might result in a more common, less distinctive&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;value.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Both findings came from comparing a hardened Firefox profile (custom&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;user.js) against Mullvad Browser on Cover Your Tracks, then investigating&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;the source of each remaining difference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your work on privacy in Firefox &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":red_heart:"&gt;❤️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>A7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-21T12:48:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>resistFingerprinting inadvertently increases uniqueness: DNT auto-enable and outdated hardwareConcurrency=2 spoof</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/resistfingerprinting-inadvertently-increases-uniqueness-dnt-auto/m-p/138870#M56435</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Mozilla,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to share two findings about Firefox's fingerprinting resistance&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;(resistFingerprinting) that I believe are working against their own goal&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;of making users less unique, rather than more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Enhanced Tracking Protection automatically enables the Do Not Track&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;header, and this cannot be disabled without also disabling tracking&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;protection itself. According to my testing on EFF's "Cover Your Tracks"&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;tool, sending DNT actually adds around 1.9 bits of identifying&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;information, because relatively few browsers send it today, making it&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;counterproductive to the goal of blending in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. When resistFingerprinting is enabled, navigator.hardwareConcurrency&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;is spoofed to a fixed value of 2, based on a 2017 Mozilla statistic&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;showing most users had 2-core devices at the time. In my testing, this&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;value now adds around 4.5 bits of identifying information, since most&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;devices today report 4+ cores by default. An updated statistic reflecting&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;current hardware trends might result in a more common, less distinctive&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;value.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Both findings came from comparing a hardened Firefox profile (custom&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;user.js) against Mullvad Browser on Cover Your Tracks, then investigating&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;the source of each remaining difference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your work on privacy in Firefox &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":red_heart:"&gt;❤️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/resistfingerprinting-inadvertently-increases-uniqueness-dnt-auto/m-p/138870#M56435</guid>
      <dc:creator>A7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-21T12:48:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

