<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic it would be nice if i could use my own extension without signing it in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/it-would-be-nice-if-i-could-use-my-own-extension-without-signing/m-p/128652#M51300</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;in order to permanently add your own extension(add-on) you have to go through an entire song and dance of creating a developer account, enabling two step verification and signing the add-on. but i dont want to publish it. it's just a little utility i have created for my personal use and the only way to use it is either load it temporarily&amp;nbsp; every time i start a browser or sign it. chromium just lets u load your extension from a file and use it so i thought it would be possible to have the same here&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>username_taken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-12T09:06:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>it would be nice if i could use my own extension without signing it</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/it-would-be-nice-if-i-could-use-my-own-extension-without-signing/m-p/128652#M51300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;in order to permanently add your own extension(add-on) you have to go through an entire song and dance of creating a developer account, enabling two step verification and signing the add-on. but i dont want to publish it. it's just a little utility i have created for my personal use and the only way to use it is either load it temporarily&amp;nbsp; every time i start a browser or sign it. chromium just lets u load your extension from a file and use it so i thought it would be possible to have the same here&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/it-would-be-nice-if-i-could-use-my-own-extension-without-signing/m-p/128652#M51300</guid>
      <dc:creator>username_taken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-12T09:06:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: it would be nice if i could use my own extension without signing it</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/it-would-be-nice-if-i-could-use-my-own-extension-without-signing/m-p/128732#M51371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I couldn't agree more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not only are there hoops to jump through, but the signing process has a dependency on &lt;STRONG&gt;Node.js&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;NPM&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Some people may not want those on their machine, given their reputation as vectors for malware infection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this discussion could really benefit having someone from Mozilla simply explain &lt;EM&gt;WHY&lt;/EM&gt; this restriction is in place, &lt;EM&gt;WHAT&lt;/EM&gt; does it purport to achieve.&amp;nbsp; If someone (rightfully) can install any (unsigned) addon they care to, then what does forcing them to re-install it at every browser restart accomplish?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;related:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="related" href="https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-disabled-my-self-made-add-on-for-quot-violating-policies/m-p/103719#M40240" target="_self"&gt;Firefox disabled my self-made add-on for "violating policies"&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/it-would-be-nice-if-i-could-use-my-own-extension-without-signing/m-p/128732#M51371</guid>
      <dc:creator>grundt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-12T14:41:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

