<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Betterbird's Rationale in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/betterbird-s-rationale/m-p/121595#M47770</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There are claims online that Thunderbird hasn't been developed very well for a long time, and that bugs have remained unfixed for months or even years. Then you hear a lot about Betterbird, including that it's a former Thunderbird developer who's making many things better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now it's 2026—what's the current state of affairs? Why aren't the bugs being fixed? Where does Betterbird excel, and why aren’t you improving on that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to decide which of the two to use, and I’m not quite sure what’s true and what isn’t. When you search for Thunderbird, you find a lot of arguments against you and many in favor of Betterbird.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’d love to hear from you about what has changed and whether you plan to become better than the fork.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 03:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NullNull777</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-06T03:46:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Betterbird's Rationale</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/betterbird-s-rationale/m-p/121595#M47770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are claims online that Thunderbird hasn't been developed very well for a long time, and that bugs have remained unfixed for months or even years. Then you hear a lot about Betterbird, including that it's a former Thunderbird developer who's making many things better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now it's 2026—what's the current state of affairs? Why aren't the bugs being fixed? Where does Betterbird excel, and why aren’t you improving on that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to decide which of the two to use, and I’m not quite sure what’s true and what isn’t. When you search for Thunderbird, you find a lot of arguments against you and many in favor of Betterbird.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’d love to hear from you about what has changed and whether you plan to become better than the fork.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 03:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/betterbird-s-rationale/m-p/121595#M47770</guid>
      <dc:creator>NullNull777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-06T03:46:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Betterbird's Rationale</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/betterbird-s-rationale/m-p/122108#M47991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;There are claims online that Thunderbird hasn't been developed very well for a long time, and that bugs have remained unfixed for months or even years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thunderbird is thriving the last several years. So you are either seeing outdated information or reading poorly informed opinions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A sampling of our focus and driving change for to benefit users:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Release notes&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/releases/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/releases/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What's happening&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://blog.thunderbird.net/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://blog.thunderbird.net/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_type&amp;amp;y_axis_field=product&amp;amp;z_axis_field=&amp;amp;query_format=report-table&amp;amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;amp;short_desc=&amp;amp;classification=Client+Software&amp;amp;classification=Components&amp;amp;product=Calendar&amp;amp;product=MailNews+Core&amp;amp;product=Thunderbird&amp;amp;resolution=FIXED&amp;amp;longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;amp;longdesc=&amp;amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;amp;status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&amp;amp;status_whiteboard=&amp;amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;amp;keywords=&amp;amp;bug_id=&amp;amp;bug_id_type=anyexact&amp;amp;votes=&amp;amp;votes_type=greaterthaneq&amp;amp;bug_type=defect&amp;amp;bug_type=enhancement&amp;amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;amp;email1=&amp;amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;amp;email2=&amp;amp;emailtype3=substring&amp;amp;email3=&amp;amp;chfield=resolution&amp;amp;chfieldvalue=fixed&amp;amp;chfieldfrom=2022-01-01&amp;amp;chfieldto=&amp;amp;j_top=AND&amp;amp;f1=short_desc&amp;amp;o1=nowordssubstr&amp;amp;v1=intermit+perma+&amp;amp;f2=component&amp;amp;o2=nowordssubstr&amp;amp;v2=+add-on+build+upstream&amp;amp;f3=OP&amp;amp;j3=AND&amp;amp;f4=creation_ts&amp;amp;o4=lessthan&amp;amp;v4=2022-01-01&amp;amp;f5=longdesc&amp;amp;o5=anywordssubstr&amp;amp;v5=&amp;amp;f6=CP&amp;amp;f7=OP&amp;amp;j7=OR&amp;amp;f8=short_desc&amp;amp;o8=anywordssubstr&amp;amp;v8=&amp;amp;f9=component&amp;amp;o9=noop&amp;amp;v9=&amp;amp;f10=CP&amp;amp;format=table&amp;amp;action=wrap" target="_self"&gt;365 items fixed or enhanced in the last four years&lt;/A&gt; (since 2022-01-01), that were reported prior to 2022-01-01.&amp;nbsp; In other words hundreds of old issues are being addressed in Thunderbird.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://roadmaps.thunderbird.net/" target="_self"&gt;The 2026 roadmap&lt;/A&gt;, which lays out the top goals for 2026.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't speak to what Betterbird does differently, but it certainly gets the vast majority of it's changes from Thunderbird.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[edited]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/betterbird-s-rationale/m-p/122108#M47991</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-06T14:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

