<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AI less functional now :( was better before in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ai-less-functional-now-was-better-before/m-p/115511#M45104</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Since last update theres an AI sidebar now. Fine, whatever. But also have broken the AI functionality that was already there and which was better?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Before , I could highlight text , right-click and then select a preset prompt straight from that context menu about the highlighted text. Which would open a sidebar anyway.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The sidebar is just objectively worse than this previous func. To achieve the same result i would have to highlight, copy, open sidebar, paste, write a prompt. Why have you done this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That context menu was pretty convenient. I stopped developing my own extension which did the same thing when i saw you guys had already polished the functionality. Replacing with the sidebar, it's no more convenient than just having an llm in a tab, so there's no reason to use it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you're going to implement AI against the loud protests of your core userbase you really , really need to think it through better than what you're doing. What is the use-case. How to do it well. It was actually a good innovation you had there, and now you've taken a step away again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MauveOtter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-09T13:30:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AI less functional now :( was better before</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ai-less-functional-now-was-better-before/m-p/115511#M45104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since last update theres an AI sidebar now. Fine, whatever. But also have broken the AI functionality that was already there and which was better?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Before , I could highlight text , right-click and then select a preset prompt straight from that context menu about the highlighted text. Which would open a sidebar anyway.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The sidebar is just objectively worse than this previous func. To achieve the same result i would have to highlight, copy, open sidebar, paste, write a prompt. Why have you done this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That context menu was pretty convenient. I stopped developing my own extension which did the same thing when i saw you guys had already polished the functionality. Replacing with the sidebar, it's no more convenient than just having an llm in a tab, so there's no reason to use it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you're going to implement AI against the loud protests of your core userbase you really , really need to think it through better than what you're doing. What is the use-case. How to do it well. It was actually a good innovation you had there, and now you've taken a step away again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ai-less-functional-now-was-better-before/m-p/115511#M45104</guid>
      <dc:creator>MauveOtter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-09T13:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

