<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic static bookmarks and shortcuts in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/static-bookmarks-and-shortcuts/m-p/114560#M44816</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Reordering bookmarks and shortcuts&amp;nbsp;is not possible. However it is important to organize bookmarks and shortcuts. Also shortcuts are allowed a few, just 16 shortcuts. On the page there are a lot of space to add many more shortcuts. Why did you make it static? This new idea hope helps more dynamic firefox browser.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>avni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-27T10:17:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>static bookmarks and shortcuts</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/static-bookmarks-and-shortcuts/m-p/114560#M44816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Reordering bookmarks and shortcuts&amp;nbsp;is not possible. However it is important to organize bookmarks and shortcuts. Also shortcuts are allowed a few, just 16 shortcuts. On the page there are a lot of space to add many more shortcuts. Why did you make it static? This new idea hope helps more dynamic firefox browser.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/static-bookmarks-and-shortcuts/m-p/114560#M44816</guid>
      <dc:creator>avni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-27T10:17:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

