<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FF ESR 140.2 missing fix vs FF 142 in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ff-esr-140-2-missing-fix-vs-ff-142/m-p/103945#M40314</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;CVE-2025-9197&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9197" target="_self"&gt;does not exist!&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>siffemcon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-23T22:42:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FF ESR 140.2 missing fix vs FF 142</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ff-esr-140-2-missing-fix-vs-ff-142/m-p/103922#M40303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As of the time of this writing (Unix epoch 1755962780), there is a high-impact bug not fixed in Firefox ESR 140.2 or ESR 128.14 even though it's been fixed in Firefox 142 (edit: fixed typo that said Firefox 140.2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you compare these three sites:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-64/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-64/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-66/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-66/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-67/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-67/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll see neither ESR pages mention CVE-2025-9197 as described in both &lt;A href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9187" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9187&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-64/#CVE-2025-9187" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2025-64/#CVE-2025-9187&lt;/A&gt;. The reference link in the Mozilla page goes to a page that says "Zarro Books found" and the NIST page tagged the Bugzilla link as a "Broken Link".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing/misunderstanding something? Or have they not patched this bug yet?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ff-esr-140-2-missing-fix-vs-ff-142/m-p/103922#M40303</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmgoldstein1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-23T16:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FF ESR 140.2 missing fix vs FF 142</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ff-esr-140-2-missing-fix-vs-ff-142/m-p/103945#M40314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;CVE-2025-9197&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9197" target="_self"&gt;does not exist!&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/ff-esr-140-2-missing-fix-vs-ff-142/m-p/103945#M40314</guid>
      <dc:creator>siffemcon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-23T22:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

