<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Base64 - Inline photos vs. photos attached to email in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/base64-inline-photos-vs-photos-attached-to-email/m-p/91057#M35358</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a plan to make Thunderbird compatible with Base64? &amp;nbsp;Photos added inline to an email from clients like Google Workspace, Apple Mail, Outlook, are seen as attachments when read using Thunderbird.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Colo-Cousin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-22T17:30:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Base64 - Inline photos vs. photos attached to email</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/base64-inline-photos-vs-photos-attached-to-email/m-p/91057#M35358</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a plan to make Thunderbird compatible with Base64? &amp;nbsp;Photos added inline to an email from clients like Google Workspace, Apple Mail, Outlook, are seen as attachments when read using Thunderbird.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/base64-inline-photos-vs-photos-attached-to-email/m-p/91057#M35358</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colo-Cousin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-22T17:30:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

