<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firefox is no longer Free software. in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-is-no-longer-free-software/m-p/89138#M34447</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorrel posted &lt;A href="https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/an-update-on-our-terms-of-use/m-p/88868#" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; a MR to Nixpkgs that he/she submitted to mark Mozilla's Firefox distribution as not free. The logic is sound: Mozilla now places restrictions on the use of Firefox, violating the Free Software Foundation's Freedom 0. Freedom 0 states:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en" target="_self"&gt;Source&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mozilla's terms of use state:&lt;BR /&gt;"You agree that you will not use Firefox to infringe anyone’s rights or violate any applicable laws or regulations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will not do anything that interferes with or disrupts Mozilla’s services or products (or the servers and networks which are connected to Mozilla’s services)."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/terms/firefox/" target="_self"&gt;Source&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two quotes are clearly contradictory. Mozilla, do you agree and do you have anything to say in response?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jefg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-06T14:46:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firefox is no longer Free software.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-is-no-longer-free-software/m-p/89138#M34447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorrel posted &lt;A href="https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/an-update-on-our-terms-of-use/m-p/88868#" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; a MR to Nixpkgs that he/she submitted to mark Mozilla's Firefox distribution as not free. The logic is sound: Mozilla now places restrictions on the use of Firefox, violating the Free Software Foundation's Freedom 0. Freedom 0 states:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en" target="_self"&gt;Source&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mozilla's terms of use state:&lt;BR /&gt;"You agree that you will not use Firefox to infringe anyone’s rights or violate any applicable laws or regulations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will not do anything that interferes with or disrupts Mozilla’s services or products (or the servers and networks which are connected to Mozilla’s services)."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/terms/firefox/" target="_self"&gt;Source&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two quotes are clearly contradictory. Mozilla, do you agree and do you have anything to say in response?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-is-no-longer-free-software/m-p/89138#M34447</guid>
      <dc:creator>jefg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T14:46:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

