<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What is going on with the TOU changes? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/what-is-going-on-with-the-tou-changes/m-p/88734#M34243</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Longtime Firefox user here, and I gotta ask—&lt;STRONG&gt;why does my web browser need a Terms of Service now?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For years, Firefox has been the go-to browser for people who care about privacy and user control. But now you’re throwing in &lt;STRONG&gt;legally binding terms&lt;/STRONG&gt; like you’re running a social media platform? The wording about “granting Mozilla a worldwide license” to use our data is vague at best and concerning at worst.&amp;nbsp;Firefox has always been &lt;STRONG&gt;a tool, not a service&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and adding legalese into the mix is shady as hell. Even if the intent isn’t bad, the wording alone is enough to &lt;STRONG&gt;destroy trust&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look, I &lt;EM&gt;want&lt;/EM&gt; to keep using Firefox. I &lt;EM&gt;really&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;do. There's so many great, seemingly insignificant features I just miss the second I open another browser.&amp;nbsp;But this kind of stuff makes it &lt;STRONG&gt;really hard to trust Mozilla.&lt;/STRONG&gt; You don’t have the luxury of pulling Google/Microsoft-level moves—&lt;STRONG&gt;your entire user base is made up of people who actually read privacy policies.&lt;/STRONG&gt; If you break that trust, we &lt;EM&gt;will&lt;/EM&gt; leave—and let’s be honest, Firefox doesn’t exactly have the market share to afford that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, real question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Are you actually going to listen to feedback and walk this back?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Or is this just the start of Firefox becoming another corporate cash grab?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Mozilla’s goal is to &lt;STRONG&gt;alienate its most loyal users and push us toward Librewolf, Brave, and other alternatives&lt;/STRONG&gt;, you’re doing a fantastic job.&amp;nbsp;I really don’t want to leave Firefox, but if this is the direction Mozilla is heading, I won’t hesitate to. And I won’t be the only one. &lt;STRONG&gt;Fix this.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope someone from Mozilla can actually respond to this instead of just giving us PR talk.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>familieslife1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-03T16:33:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is going on with the TOU changes?</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/what-is-going-on-with-the-tou-changes/m-p/88734#M34243</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Longtime Firefox user here, and I gotta ask—&lt;STRONG&gt;why does my web browser need a Terms of Service now?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For years, Firefox has been the go-to browser for people who care about privacy and user control. But now you’re throwing in &lt;STRONG&gt;legally binding terms&lt;/STRONG&gt; like you’re running a social media platform? The wording about “granting Mozilla a worldwide license” to use our data is vague at best and concerning at worst.&amp;nbsp;Firefox has always been &lt;STRONG&gt;a tool, not a service&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and adding legalese into the mix is shady as hell. Even if the intent isn’t bad, the wording alone is enough to &lt;STRONG&gt;destroy trust&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look, I &lt;EM&gt;want&lt;/EM&gt; to keep using Firefox. I &lt;EM&gt;really&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;do. There's so many great, seemingly insignificant features I just miss the second I open another browser.&amp;nbsp;But this kind of stuff makes it &lt;STRONG&gt;really hard to trust Mozilla.&lt;/STRONG&gt; You don’t have the luxury of pulling Google/Microsoft-level moves—&lt;STRONG&gt;your entire user base is made up of people who actually read privacy policies.&lt;/STRONG&gt; If you break that trust, we &lt;EM&gt;will&lt;/EM&gt; leave—and let’s be honest, Firefox doesn’t exactly have the market share to afford that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, real question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Are you actually going to listen to feedback and walk this back?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Or is this just the start of Firefox becoming another corporate cash grab?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Mozilla’s goal is to &lt;STRONG&gt;alienate its most loyal users and push us toward Librewolf, Brave, and other alternatives&lt;/STRONG&gt;, you’re doing a fantastic job.&amp;nbsp;I really don’t want to leave Firefox, but if this is the direction Mozilla is heading, I won’t hesitate to. And I won’t be the only one. &lt;STRONG&gt;Fix this.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope someone from Mozilla can actually respond to this instead of just giving us PR talk.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/what-is-going-on-with-the-tou-changes/m-p/88734#M34243</guid>
      <dc:creator>familieslife1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-03T16:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is going on with the TOU changes?</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/what-is-going-on-with-the-tou-changes/m-p/89542#M34642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The silence is deafening.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 01:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/what-is-going-on-with-the-tou-changes/m-p/89542#M34642</guid>
      <dc:creator>jefg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-10T01:16:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

