<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firefox spellcheck dictionary is inadequate and suggested spellings are nonsensical. in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/77259#M29531</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm yet to come across a spellchecker that works exactly how I'd like. This is mainly because of far too many missing entries. A (seemingly) easy solution would be to use the entire contents of Wikipedia with each word/term/phrase sorted A-Z (and all duplicates deleted). That would instantly make a spellchecker FAR better than any existing one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And when it comes to spellchecking letters written in a word processor, then pretty much every line of every address is queried by spellcheckers, including postcodes/ZIP codes. I live in the UK and years ago you could buy a DVD from the Royal Mail of all the addresses in the UK. I don't know if that's still the case, but if all the addresses in a particular country (or countries plural) could be imported into a spellchecker that would eliminate this annoying spellcheck problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JimCarner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-07T20:09:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firefox spellcheck dictionary is inadequate and suggested spellings are nonsensical.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/42688#M15600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Firefox spellcheck dictionary is inadequate and suggested spellings are nonsensical.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:42:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/42688#M15600</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken_Crawford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-26T17:42:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firefox spellcheck dictionary is inadequate and suggested spellings are nonsensical.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/77259#M29531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm yet to come across a spellchecker that works exactly how I'd like. This is mainly because of far too many missing entries. A (seemingly) easy solution would be to use the entire contents of Wikipedia with each word/term/phrase sorted A-Z (and all duplicates deleted). That would instantly make a spellchecker FAR better than any existing one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And when it comes to spellchecking letters written in a word processor, then pretty much every line of every address is queried by spellcheckers, including postcodes/ZIP codes. I live in the UK and years ago you could buy a DVD from the Royal Mail of all the addresses in the UK. I don't know if that's still the case, but if all the addresses in a particular country (or countries plural) could be imported into a spellchecker that would eliminate this annoying spellcheck problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/77259#M29531</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimCarner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-07T20:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firefox spellcheck dictionary is inadequate and suggested spellings are nonsensical.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/79150#M30167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So Ok, Jim - that's cool - but you basically confused OP's issue and questioned the idea in general. "I want THIS spell checker to be better, it is BAD." "I'm yet to come across a spellchecker that works exactly how I'd like." ... It's not even in the same room, and since when are people asking us how we'd like our spellchecker's to work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever, KEN, MY MAN, YES - THE SPELLCHECK has some GARBAGE SUGGESTIONS, COMPLETELY UNHELPFUL, have to Google words instead - it can be better, we use better spellchecks in programs every day, Jim, so yeah - Mozilla - Cmon. Investigate and update how suggestions work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-spellcheck-dictionary-is-inadequate-and-suggested/m-p/79150#M30167</guid>
      <dc:creator>314_KASTET</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-25T00:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

