<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance worse under Firefox 128? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/performance-worse-under-firefox-128/m-p/62616#M21992</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Performance definitely seems to be much worse under 128. Is there any way I can figure out for certain if it's Firefox or something else going on? The most visible diagnostic I know about involves the Task Manager which shows a lot of mysterious System activity. Negative evidence from Safari on a Mac that shows no notable performance changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still think the bottom line is the business model. Why would I donate when the changes are almost always for the worse? Sorry, but I cannot remember the last time I noticed a change that I would have donated to support. Perhaps even worse, I have noticed a couple of changes I might donate for, but there is no mechanism to do that. So in the form of a question, if you could donate specifically to a specific feature, would you? The idea would be to implement changes only AFTER enough people want to pay. And if it ain't broke, STOP FIXING IT. It's definitely broke now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shanen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-17T02:33:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance worse under Firefox 128?</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/performance-worse-under-firefox-128/m-p/62616#M21992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Performance definitely seems to be much worse under 128. Is there any way I can figure out for certain if it's Firefox or something else going on? The most visible diagnostic I know about involves the Task Manager which shows a lot of mysterious System activity. Negative evidence from Safari on a Mac that shows no notable performance changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still think the bottom line is the business model. Why would I donate when the changes are almost always for the worse? Sorry, but I cannot remember the last time I noticed a change that I would have donated to support. Perhaps even worse, I have noticed a couple of changes I might donate for, but there is no mechanism to do that. So in the form of a question, if you could donate specifically to a specific feature, would you? The idea would be to implement changes only AFTER enough people want to pay. And if it ain't broke, STOP FIXING IT. It's definitely broke now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/performance-worse-under-firefox-128/m-p/62616#M21992</guid>
      <dc:creator>shanen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-17T02:33:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

