<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WebGPU support in nightly build 126.0a1 (2024-04-14) (W11/64-Bit/Nvidia 551.86) in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/webgpu-support-in-nightly-build-126-0a1-2024-04-14-w11-64-bit/m-p/55178#M19412</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;I know that the WebGPU specification is not yet finalized, and support in Firefox is only experimental. However, I find it surprising that the WebGPU implementation performs slightly worse than in other browsers (Chrome/Edge).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When one looks at the 3d rendering WebGPU examples on bevyengine.org, the issues become quickly apparent. Interestingly, bevy also uses wgpu and naga under the hood, so I would have expected fewer problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS: Windows 11 Pro - 10.0.22631 N/A Build 22631&lt;BR /&gt;VGA: Nvidia RTX 4070 TI Super - Driver 551.86&lt;BR /&gt;Firefox: Nightlybuild 126.0a1 (2024-04-14)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Examples:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/bloom-3d/" target="_blank"&gt;https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/bloom-3d/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/3d-shapes/" target="_blank"&gt;https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/3d-shapes/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ElDiddi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-14T19:03:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WebGPU support in nightly build 126.0a1 (2024-04-14) (W11/64-Bit/Nvidia 551.86)</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/webgpu-support-in-nightly-build-126-0a1-2024-04-14-w11-64-bit/m-p/55178#M19412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;I know that the WebGPU specification is not yet finalized, and support in Firefox is only experimental. However, I find it surprising that the WebGPU implementation performs slightly worse than in other browsers (Chrome/Edge).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When one looks at the 3d rendering WebGPU examples on bevyengine.org, the issues become quickly apparent. Interestingly, bevy also uses wgpu and naga under the hood, so I would have expected fewer problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS: Windows 11 Pro - 10.0.22631 N/A Build 22631&lt;BR /&gt;VGA: Nvidia RTX 4070 TI Super - Driver 551.86&lt;BR /&gt;Firefox: Nightlybuild 126.0a1 (2024-04-14)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Examples:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/bloom-3d/" target="_blank"&gt;https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/bloom-3d/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/3d-shapes/" target="_blank"&gt;https://bevyengine.org/examples-webgpu/3D%20Rendering/3d-shapes/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/webgpu-support-in-nightly-build-126-0a1-2024-04-14-w11-64-bit/m-p/55178#M19412</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElDiddi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-14T19:03:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

