<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thunderbird Supernova 115 &amp;quot;Cards view&amp;quot; is counterproductive. in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/thunderbird-supernova-115-quot-cards-view-quot-is/m-p/44096#M15920</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I tested this new option to evaluate the effects of it in my usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1]&lt;BR /&gt;The number of displayed emails in my list jumped to 17 instead of 37 in the Table view (NB: I use the vertical view).&lt;BR /&gt;Of course I reverted the option to Table view.&lt;BR /&gt;More over, the number of fields that you can display in the Table view is much greater than in the Cards view.&lt;BR /&gt;The announcement "This new way of displaying your message list is ... more &lt;STRONG&gt;compact"&lt;/STRONG&gt; claimed in a promotion page* is simply the &lt;STRONG&gt;contrary of what I observe&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2]&lt;BR /&gt;It is also proclaimed, about the Cards view, "perfect for people used to modern webmail" **.&lt;BR /&gt;But must an interface design follow &lt;STRONG&gt;fashions&lt;/STRONG&gt; even when the are &lt;STRONG&gt;very bad&lt;/STRONG&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fortunately the user can choose the way of displaying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This disagreeing about this new option must not dissimulate my gratitude towards the developers who are making a great job in producing Thunderbird that I globally value as excellent.&lt;BR /&gt;I also appreciate innovations as improvements in keyboard navigation, customizing the message header (although of little use for me)...&lt;BR /&gt;j-p&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.thunderbird.net/2023/08/make-thunderbird-yours-how-to-get-the-thunderbird-115-supernova-look/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://blog.thunderbird.net/2023/08/make-thunderbird-yours-how-to-get-the-thunderbird-115-supernova-look/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;**:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/115.0/whatsnew/?locale=en-US&amp;amp;version=115.4.1&amp;amp;channel=release&amp;amp;oldversion=102.15.1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/115.0/whatsnew/?locale=en-US&amp;amp;version=115.4.1&amp;amp;channel=release&amp;amp;oldversion=102.15.1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 14:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>j-p_FF</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-04T14:26:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thunderbird Supernova 115 "Cards view" is counterproductive.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/thunderbird-supernova-115-quot-cards-view-quot-is/m-p/44096#M15920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tested this new option to evaluate the effects of it in my usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1]&lt;BR /&gt;The number of displayed emails in my list jumped to 17 instead of 37 in the Table view (NB: I use the vertical view).&lt;BR /&gt;Of course I reverted the option to Table view.&lt;BR /&gt;More over, the number of fields that you can display in the Table view is much greater than in the Cards view.&lt;BR /&gt;The announcement "This new way of displaying your message list is ... more &lt;STRONG&gt;compact"&lt;/STRONG&gt; claimed in a promotion page* is simply the &lt;STRONG&gt;contrary of what I observe&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2]&lt;BR /&gt;It is also proclaimed, about the Cards view, "perfect for people used to modern webmail" **.&lt;BR /&gt;But must an interface design follow &lt;STRONG&gt;fashions&lt;/STRONG&gt; even when the are &lt;STRONG&gt;very bad&lt;/STRONG&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fortunately the user can choose the way of displaying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This disagreeing about this new option must not dissimulate my gratitude towards the developers who are making a great job in producing Thunderbird that I globally value as excellent.&lt;BR /&gt;I also appreciate innovations as improvements in keyboard navigation, customizing the message header (although of little use for me)...&lt;BR /&gt;j-p&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.thunderbird.net/2023/08/make-thunderbird-yours-how-to-get-the-thunderbird-115-supernova-look/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://blog.thunderbird.net/2023/08/make-thunderbird-yours-how-to-get-the-thunderbird-115-supernova-look/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;**:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/115.0/whatsnew/?locale=en-US&amp;amp;version=115.4.1&amp;amp;channel=release&amp;amp;oldversion=102.15.1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/115.0/whatsnew/?locale=en-US&amp;amp;version=115.4.1&amp;amp;channel=release&amp;amp;oldversion=102.15.1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2023 14:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/thunderbird-supernova-115-quot-cards-view-quot-is/m-p/44096#M15920</guid>
      <dc:creator>j-p_FF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-04T14:26:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thunderbird Supernova 115 "Cards view" is counterproductive.</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/thunderbird-supernova-115-quot-cards-view-quot-is/m-p/50315#M17997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 20:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/thunderbird-supernova-115-quot-cards-view-quot-is/m-p/50315#M17997</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsmwk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-28T20:45:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

