<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Deeply disappointed in features in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/deeply-disappointed-in-features/m-p/43412#M15648</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;agreed. Developer navel-gazing is a common problem: sure whatever new feature they introduced is neato from a coding perspective, maybe, but they ought to be writing for users, not to impress other developers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 02:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RMS06510</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-28T02:18:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deeply disappointed in features</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/deeply-disappointed-in-features/m-p/40639#M14512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Some time ago, Mozilla discontinued PWAs... claiming not enough people used those. Now, Mozilla keeps ignoring a lot of people asking for tab grouping feature other modern browsers have. What makes me quite angry is the recent update of &lt;STRONG&gt;Firefox View&lt;/STRONG&gt;. We have been talking about it on Reddit, and neither I nor other people seem to be using it, not even opening it ONCE. And we are talking about PWAs not having enough users to implement it? So how does such a useless feature as Firefox View get attention, and not, say tab groups? It saddens me - Firefox was an innovator a decade ago, a tool that showed others how it is done. And now? it lacks essential features every major browser has? I Like Firefox, but it's hard to stick with it when developers are focusing on wrong features all the time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Take this as feedback of a single user, since I got a pop-up to leave my feedback while checking Beta release notes. Maybe I am in the minority and out of touch, but previous discussions I had don't indicate it's the case. So yeah, tab groups, I think we need them, as people who work with a lot of tabs - programmers/researchers, we constantly group data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/deeply-disappointed-in-features/m-p/40639#M14512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Visions</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-01T08:49:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deeply disappointed in features</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/deeply-disappointed-in-features/m-p/43412#M15648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;agreed. Developer navel-gazing is a common problem: sure whatever new feature they introduced is neato from a coding perspective, maybe, but they ought to be writing for users, not to impress other developers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 02:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/deeply-disappointed-in-features/m-p/43412#M15648</guid>
      <dc:creator>RMS06510</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-28T02:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

