<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firefox development leads should be cautious in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-development-leads-should-be-cautious/m-p/40987#M14656</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;History seems to be repeating itself at mozilla. Years back a head developer who seemed to have a lot of influence convinced mozilla to move to a rapid rollout model for updates. In the process they ignored the 3rd party developers and let them fall where they may.&amp;nbsp; The consequences of that move was catastrophic for the mozilla firefox project, 3rd party developers simply stop developing for firefox and focused on chrome development, as a result there was a loss of equal extension options between chrome and firefox and many users began to abandon firefox.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I've noticed recently that the project is returned back to a rapid rollout model, this post should act as a reminder of the consequences of this approach.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markimark8</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-04T14:55:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firefox development leads should be cautious</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-development-leads-should-be-cautious/m-p/40987#M14656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;History seems to be repeating itself at mozilla. Years back a head developer who seemed to have a lot of influence convinced mozilla to move to a rapid rollout model for updates. In the process they ignored the 3rd party developers and let them fall where they may.&amp;nbsp; The consequences of that move was catastrophic for the mozilla firefox project, 3rd party developers simply stop developing for firefox and focused on chrome development, as a result there was a loss of equal extension options between chrome and firefox and many users began to abandon firefox.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I've noticed recently that the project is returned back to a rapid rollout model, this post should act as a reminder of the consequences of this approach.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-development-leads-should-be-cautious/m-p/40987#M14656</guid>
      <dc:creator>markimark8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-04T14:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

