<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Capitalization of .htm in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/capitalization-of-htm/m-p/38239#M13791</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Feedback: Saving an index file as ".htm" with the "htm" becoming "HTM" is not very useful in html 5 website building.&amp;nbsp; Index.HTM is an entirely different animal. I will figure away around this but it may not be using Firefox. Using Firefox 116 in privacy mode because of the lockstep unrestrained attitude towards cookies which can interfere with accurate or even successful uploading of websites.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>etaoqua</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-28T21:13:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Capitalization of .htm</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/capitalization-of-htm/m-p/38239#M13791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Feedback: Saving an index file as ".htm" with the "htm" becoming "HTM" is not very useful in html 5 website building.&amp;nbsp; Index.HTM is an entirely different animal. I will figure away around this but it may not be using Firefox. Using Firefox 116 in privacy mode because of the lockstep unrestrained attitude towards cookies which can interfere with accurate or even successful uploading of websites.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/capitalization-of-htm/m-p/38239#M13791</guid>
      <dc:creator>etaoqua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-28T21:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

