<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Do you really need to block ALL downloads since Firefox 93? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/do-you-really-need-to-block-all-downloads-since-firefox-93/m-p/26625#M10623</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24606"&gt;@Inuya5ha&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently I noticed 95% of my &lt;A href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/10/05/firefox-93-protects-against-insecure-downloads/" target="_self"&gt;downloads being blocked&lt;/A&gt; by firefox with alarmist "CRITICAL SECURITY RISK DO NOT PROCEED YOUR DRIVE WILL BE ERASED AND YOUR BANK ACCOUNT EMPTIED" warnings solely based on the &lt;STRONG&gt;http&lt;/STRONG&gt; origin of the file. As a web developer and UX designer I can't begin to describe how this policy is beyond absurd and wrong, &lt;STRONG&gt;the end user doesn't know nor care about the protocol used to transfer a file.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume you're joking about the message you're getting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a hidden setting to turn off this feature, but as the web developer, you certainly can't assume a user will change this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(A)&lt;/EM&gt; In a new tab, type or paste &lt;STRONG&gt;about:config&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the address bar and press Enter/Return. Click the button accepting the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;More info on about:config:&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;A href="https://support.mozilla.org/kb/about-config-editor-firefox" target="_self"&gt;Configuration Editor for Firefox&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;EM&gt;Please keep in mind that changes made through this back door aren't fully supported and aren't guaranteed to continue working in the future.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(B)&lt;/EM&gt; In the search box in the page, type or paste&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;dom.block_download_insecure&lt;/STRONG&gt; and pause while the list is filtered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(C)&lt;/EM&gt; Double-click the preference to switch the value from true to false&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that this error only occurs in the HTTPS-requests-HTTP context, similar to mixed active content blocking. A legacy site that still uses HTTP for the page itself isn't affected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jscher2000</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-10T07:15:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do you really need to block ALL downloads since Firefox 93?</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/do-you-really-need-to-block-all-downloads-since-firefox-93/m-p/26595#M10613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently I noticed 95% of my &lt;A href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/10/05/firefox-93-protects-against-insecure-downloads/" target="_self"&gt;downloads being blocked&lt;/A&gt; by firefox with alarmist "CRITICAL SECURITY RISK DO NOT PROCEED YOUR DRIVE WILL BE ERASED AND YOUR BANK ACCOUNT EMPTIED" warnings solely based on the &lt;STRONG&gt;http&lt;/STRONG&gt; origin of the file. As a web developer and UX designer I can't begin to describe how this policy is beyond absurd and wrong, &lt;STRONG&gt;the end user doesn't know nor care about the protocol used to transfer a file.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;Simply put, the provisioning of HTTP/HTTPS protocol for downloads only matters to developers, enterprises and content providers, &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;not the end-user&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt; If Facebook, Hotmail, Download.com, Codecs.com or whatever site offers file download via HTTP with HTTPS navigation, kindly contact them to explain why this is a dangerous and hazardous practice that must be urgently terminated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What percentage of your users currently have their files "&lt;EM&gt;modified or tampered with&lt;/EM&gt;" during download, that justified this blocking to the general public?&lt;/STRONG&gt; Give us a number please, no matter how small. Is it 0.00000000000000000000000000012%? I personally never had such problem in 35 years nor heard of anyone else either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you be so kind to stop seeing security menaces when there is none, for a change? Idiotic policies such as this will only speed up the rate of Firefox usings moving to Chrome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;A more subtle way to adopt this unneeded policy would've been to show a small yellow warning icon next the downloaded file with a 10px sized label "Downloaded from http, potentially insecure in one-in-a-zillion cases", instead of blocking the file altogether.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 15:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/do-you-really-need-to-block-all-downloads-since-firefox-93/m-p/26595#M10613</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inuya5ha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-09T15:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do you really need to block ALL downloads since Firefox 93?</title>
      <link>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/do-you-really-need-to-block-all-downloads-since-firefox-93/m-p/26625#M10623</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24606"&gt;@Inuya5ha&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently I noticed 95% of my &lt;A href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/10/05/firefox-93-protects-against-insecure-downloads/" target="_self"&gt;downloads being blocked&lt;/A&gt; by firefox with alarmist "CRITICAL SECURITY RISK DO NOT PROCEED YOUR DRIVE WILL BE ERASED AND YOUR BANK ACCOUNT EMPTIED" warnings solely based on the &lt;STRONG&gt;http&lt;/STRONG&gt; origin of the file. As a web developer and UX designer I can't begin to describe how this policy is beyond absurd and wrong, &lt;STRONG&gt;the end user doesn't know nor care about the protocol used to transfer a file.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume you're joking about the message you're getting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a hidden setting to turn off this feature, but as the web developer, you certainly can't assume a user will change this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(A)&lt;/EM&gt; In a new tab, type or paste &lt;STRONG&gt;about:config&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the address bar and press Enter/Return. Click the button accepting the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;More info on about:config:&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;A href="https://support.mozilla.org/kb/about-config-editor-firefox" target="_self"&gt;Configuration Editor for Firefox&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;EM&gt;Please keep in mind that changes made through this back door aren't fully supported and aren't guaranteed to continue working in the future.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(B)&lt;/EM&gt; In the search box in the page, type or paste&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;dom.block_download_insecure&lt;/STRONG&gt; and pause while the list is filtered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(C)&lt;/EM&gt; Double-click the preference to switch the value from true to false&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that this error only occurs in the HTTPS-requests-HTTP context, similar to mixed active content blocking. A legacy site that still uses HTTP for the page itself isn't affected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/do-you-really-need-to-block-all-downloads-since-firefox-93/m-p/26625#M10623</guid>
      <dc:creator>jscher2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-10T07:15:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

